Skip to content

egos and evolution

April 15, 2011

I’ve just stared reading Carl Zimmer’s “Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea”–again, I love Carl Zimmer–and his introduction drove something home for me. My thoughts here aren’t novel, I’m sure, but I feel strongly about them.

All of the denialism– that climate change isn’t happening, or if it is it is a ‘natural cycle’, that vaccines cause autism, that evolution isn’t true, or if it is only in the short term, or only within a species– is all ego-driven.

Our galaxy

People just can’t stand the idea that we aren’t the center of the universe.

Evolution asks you to admit that the tree of life does not culminate with the most successful species–us–and that the branch of our lineage is more of a bunch of twigs, the smallest which we are. Humbling. As Stephen Jay Gould explains in the introduction to Zimmer’s book, the only other scientific discovery that shook our believe so thoroughly was the earth’s demotion from the center of the universe to one small planet of many orbiting a small star in an insignificant arm of our galaxy, only one of many billions in an infinite universe. But that switch was geographical and evolution hits closer to home.

Climate change is a smaller challenge, but of the same flavor. No, the world is not a sphere that exists merely for humans to reign over, but a complex system that we have pushed out of balance. Gould says that science gives us facts, but not answers to how to deal with those facts:

 “In principle, the factual state of the universe, whatever it may be, cannot teach us how we should live or what our lives mean–for these ethical questions of value and meaning belong to such difference realms of human life as religion, philosophy, and humanistic study.”

Light moth, dark moth– which do you eat?

And I don’t mean to say “bad, you! bad denier you!”. It is understandable, the reluctance to step out of the cave and see the real world. It is more comforting to look at the shadows on the wall and believe they are true. Anything outside of that is scary, possibly unsafe. Our brains have been pushed by millions of years of natural selection to be cautious and wary of the unknown (Haha, you see what I did there). I’ve even heard scientists, working in biology and medicine, express doubt that evolution can effect change as drastic as the rise of a new species. This coming from people who understand that mutations and selective pressures can give one group of bacteria an edge when digesting lactose, something that allows them to out-grow competitors in an environment poor in sugars other than lactose. Or that moths with darker pigmentation will elude predators more often than their lighter cousins in a forest ruled by trees with dark trunks.

But honestly, many people are twisting the facts, creating shadowy unknowns, and downright lying just because they are uncomfortable with new ideas. I may be wrong here, but communicators, educators and scientists alike have again and again ‘proven’ evolution, climate change, etc., and the other side of the ‘debate’ sticks their fingers in their ears and chants ‘lalaalacan’thearyou’, waits a little while, then comes back to the EXACT same argument. See the bacterial flagellum– a supposed example of irreducible complexity by the Intelligent Design pushers that has been declared  in court to be quite good evidence FOR evolution.

It isn’t a battle or a debate because the other side doesn’t listen or care.  No one is winning here, but we may all be loosing. Our children are loosing, when they aren’t taught the beauty and truth of evolution and how to think creatively about problems, but instead told that scientists really aren’t sure about evolution (wrong) and that Intelligent Design is a science (really wrong). The poor of the world are loosing, as the vast majority of people that will be the hardest hit by famine, drought and rising sea levels are those in the developing world.

Man, I just want to say ‘give it up already!’ and ‘believe’ in science.

Edit: an earlier version of this post incorrectly attributed the quote on dealing with facts as belonging to Carl Zimmer. Actually, the quote was from the introduction of “Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea”, written by renowned evolutionary biologist, Stephen Jay Gould. The post has been corrected.

Advertisements
3 Comments leave one →
  1. rogerthesurf permalink
    April 15, 2011 3:57 pm

    If you are so well qualified to preach to us what we should believe ,why dont you see if you can answer this question.

    Do you know how soon will it be before we are fully effected by the 7 meter sea level rise caused by the melting of the Greenland ice cap?

    Make sure you quote your sources.

    Cheers

    Roger

    http://www.rogerfromnewzealand.wordpress.com

    • roese permalink*
      April 15, 2011 9:06 pm

      Well, I don’t really mean to preach. I’m learning how to best communicate this information, but I’m still young and inexperienced enough that I mostly feel strongly about it.

      The 7 meter rise is commonly cited as a worst case possibility. An example is here on the Greenpeace website citing the IPCC: “Climate models indicate that the local warming over Greenland is likely to be one to three times th global average. Ice sheet models project that a local warming of larger than 3°C [5.4°F], if sustained for millennia, would lead to virtually a complete melting of the Greenland ice sheet with a resulting sea-level rise of about 7 m [23 ft].” — IPCC 3rd Assessment, Synthesis Report, Summary for Policy Makers

      The timescale given there is millennia. Predicting when is complicated by questions: what is the extent of climate change now, how fast is it changing, and can we slow the change? Of course, you can barely talk about slowing the the change or preventing worst case if people and policy makers don’t even agree that it is happening.

      I guess I’ve been thinking about it because I’ve been reading this great blog: wanderinggaia.com. She writes about traveling the world, visiting incredible people and countries, climate change and globalization. Here is a post about her thoughts on finding a solution to the climate crisis.

      Thanks for your comment. I hope you can take the time to look at sources more informed than I:
      http://www.ipcc.ch/
      http://www.climatechangecorp.com/
      http://www.desmogblog.com/
      and there are many more sites out there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: